<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Libra Medical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libramed.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libramed.com</link>
	<description>CRO, Contract Research Organization, Regulatory Consulting, Quality Systems consulting, MAESTRO CTMS, Clinical database</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:04:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Guidance for Industry Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Information</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/06/guidance-for-industry-responding-to-unsolicited-requests-for-off-label-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/06/guidance-for-industry-responding-to-unsolicited-requests-for-off-label-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This draft guidance is intended to describe the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA or Agency) current thinking about how manufacturers and distributors (firms) of prescription human and animal drug products (drugs) and medical devices (devices) can respond to unsolicited requests for information about unapproved or uncleared indications or conditions of use (off-label information) related to their FDA-approved or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This draft guidance is intended to describe the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA or Agency) current thinking about how manufacturers and distributors (firms) of prescription human and animal drug products (drugs) and medical devices (devices) can respond to unsolicited requests for information about unapproved or uncleared indications or conditions of use (off-label information) related to their FDA-approved or cleared products. <a href="http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM285145.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM285145.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/06/guidance-for-industry-responding-to-unsolicited-requests-for-off-label-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Guidance &#8211; CDRH Appeals Processes</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/06/draft-guidance-cdrh-appeals-processes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/06/draft-guidance-cdrh-appeals-processes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Individuals outside of FDA who disagree with a decision or action taken by CDRH and wish to have it reviewed or reconsidered have several processes for resolution from which to choose, including: requests for supervisory review of an action; petitions; and hearings. These processes are broadly described in FDA regulations. This draft document provides general [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individuals outside of FDA who disagree with a decision or action taken by CDRH and wish to have it reviewed or reconsidered have several processes for resolution from which to choose, including: requests for supervisory review of an action; petitions; and hearings. These processes are broadly described in FDA regulations. This draft document provides general information about each process, as well as guidance on how to submit related requests to CDRH and FDA. <a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm284651.htm#1" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm284651.htm#1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/06/draft-guidance-cdrh-appeals-processes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New 510(k) Paradigm &#8211; Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications &#8211; Final Guidance</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/04/the-new-510k-paradigm-alternate-approaches-to-demonstrating-substantial-equivalence-in-premarket-notifications-final-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/04/the-new-510k-paradigm-alternate-approaches-to-demonstrating-substantial-equivalence-in-premarket-notifications-final-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This document provides guidance to the regulated industry and reviewers on two alternative approaches that may be used, under appropriate circumstances, to demonstrate substantial equivalence. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080187.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This document provides guidance to the regulated industry and reviewers on two alternative approaches that may be used, under appropriate circumstances, to demonstrate substantial equivalence. <a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080187.htm" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080187.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/04/the-new-510k-paradigm-alternate-approaches-to-demonstrating-substantial-equivalence-in-premarket-notifications-final-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Guidance &#8211; Medical Device Classification Product Codes</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/04/draft-guidance-medical-device-classification-product-codes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/04/draft-guidance-medical-device-classification-product-codes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this guidance document is to educate regulated industry and FDA Staff on how, when and why to use classification product codes for medical devices regulated by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm285317.htm?source=govdelivery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of this guidance document is to educate regulated industry and FDA Staff on how, when and why to use classification product codes for medical devices regulated by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). <a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm285317.htm?source=govdelivery" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm285317.htm?source=govdelivery</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2012/01/04/draft-guidance-medical-device-classification-product-codes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brown on bill to streamline &#8216;de novo&#8217; FDA reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/brown-on-bill-to-streamline-de-novo-fda-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/brown-on-bill-to-streamline-de-novo-fda-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) wants the FDA to make it easier for medical device makers to get new, less risky devices through the federal watchdog agency. http://www.massdevice.com/news/update-brown-bill-streamline-de-novo-fda-reviews]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) wants the FDA to make it easier for medical device makers to get new, less risky devices through the federal watchdog agency. <a href="http://www.massdevice.com/news/update-brown-bill-streamline-de-novo-fda-reviews">http://www.massdevice.com/news/update-brown-bill-streamline-de-novo-fda-reviews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/brown-on-bill-to-streamline-de-novo-fda-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA, med-tech leaders seek accord</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/fda-med-tech-leaders-seek-accord/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/fda-med-tech-leaders-seek-accord/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The industry and the agency want ways to speed up development and approval of new devices without cutting corners on safety. http://www.startribune.com/business/135218348.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The industry and the agency want ways to speed up development and approval of new devices without cutting corners on safety. <a href="http://www.startribune.com/business/135218348.html">http://www.startribune.com/business/135218348.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/fda-med-tech-leaders-seek-accord/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medtronic Wins FDA Panel Backing to Allow Defibrillators for More Patients</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/medtronic-wins-fda-panel-backing-to-allow-defibrillators-for-more-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/medtronic-wins-fda-panel-backing-to-allow-defibrillators-for-more-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medtronic Inc. (MDT), the world’s biggest maker of heart-rhythm devices, won the backing of an advisory panel to expand the use of defibrillators that synchronize the right and left chambers of the heart. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-07/medtronic-wins-fda-panel-backing-to-allow-defibrillators-for-more-patients.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medtronic Inc. (MDT), the world’s biggest maker of heart-rhythm devices, won the backing of an advisory panel to expand the use of defibrillators that synchronize the right and left chambers of the heart. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-07/medtronic-wins-fda-panel-backing-to-allow-defibrillators-for-more-patients.html">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-07/medtronic-wins-fda-panel-backing-to-allow-defibrillators-for-more-patients.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2011/12/09/medtronic-wins-fda-panel-backing-to-allow-defibrillators-for-more-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Guidance &#8211; In Vitro Companion Diagnostic Devices</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/23/draft-guidance-in-vitro-companion-diagnostic-devices-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/23/draft-guidance-in-vitro-companion-diagnostic-devices-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guidance is intended to assist (1) sponsors who are planning to develop a therapeutic product1 that depends on the use of an in vitro companion diagnostic device (or test) for its safe and effective use and (2) sponsors planning to develop an in vitro companion diagnostic device that is intended to be used with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guidance is intended to assist (1) sponsors who are planning to develop a therapeutic product<a id="rrtaa51" href="#ft1"><sup>1</sup></a> that <em>depends on</em> the use of an in vitro companion diagnostic device (or test) for its safe and effective use and (2) sponsors planning to develop an in vitro companion diagnostic device that is intended to be used with a corresponding therapeutic product. <a href="http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm262292.htm" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm262292.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/23/draft-guidance-in-vitro-companion-diagnostic-devices-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Synthes, Norian execs receive prison terms</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/23/former-synthes-norian-execs-receive-prison-terms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/23/former-synthes-norian-execs-receive-prison-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three former executives of devicemaker Synthes and subsidiary Norian were sentenced to prison for their roles in illegal clinical trials of a bone cement in spine surgeries, federal prosecutors in Philadelphia said. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20111122/NEWS/311229961?AllowView=VW8xUmo5Q21TcWJOb1gzb0tNN3RLZ0h0MWg5SVgra3NZRzROR3l0WWRMZmFWZjhERWxiNUtpQzMyWmFxNVg0WUpicWc=&#38;utm_source=newsletter&#38;utm_medium=email&#38;utm_campaign=am]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Three former executives of devicemaker Synthes and subsidiary Norian were sentenced to prison for their roles in illegal clinical trials of a bone cement in spine surgeries, federal prosecutors in Philadelphia said. <a href="http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20111122/NEWS/311229961?AllowView=VW8xUmo5Q21TcWJOb1gzb0tNN3RLZ0h0MWg5SVgra3NZRzROR3l0WWRMZmFWZjhERWxiNUtpQzMyWmFxNVg0WUpicWc=&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=am" target="_blank">http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20111122/NEWS/311229961?AllowView=VW8xUmo5Q21TcWJOb1gzb0tNN3RLZ0h0MWg5SVgra3NZRzROR3l0WWRMZmFWZjhERWxiNUtpQzMyWmFxNVg0WUpicWc=&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=am</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/23/former-synthes-norian-execs-receive-prison-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Stent Type Has Rare But Potentially Serious Problem, FDA Investigates</title>
		<link>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/21/new-stent-type-has-rare-but-potentially-serious-problem-fda-investigates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/21/new-stent-type-has-rare-but-potentially-serious-problem-fda-investigates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dblaeser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libramed.com/?p=1925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FDA says it is working with drug-eluting stent makers to better understand what makes the devices shrink or become deformed on rare occasions. A drug-eluting stent is a scaffold placed into narrowed, diseased peripheral or coronary arteries; it releases a medication to block cell proliferation, which helps prevent eventual reclogging of the blood vessel. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDA says it is working with drug-eluting stent makers to better understand what makes the devices shrink or become deformed on rare occasions. A drug-eluting stent is a scaffold placed into narrowed, diseased peripheral or coronary arteries; it releases a medication to block cell proliferation, which helps prevent eventual reclogging of the blood vessel. The DES (drug-eluting stent) is placed during an angioplasty procedure.<br />
<a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/237999.php" target="_blank">http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/237999.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libramed.com/2011/11/21/new-stent-type-has-rare-but-potentially-serious-problem-fda-investigates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

